On the Institute’s website (in the “Our Publications” section), is available the electronic version of the analytical report “Socio-political solidarity in Ukraine in the post-war period: forecast estimates”.

The analytical report contains a forward-looking analysis of problems that may affect the level of solidarity within Ukrainian society after the end of the Russian–Ukrainian war, in the context of Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction. It examines the readiness of the country’s political and institutional system to perform a consolidating role; analyzes potential lines of social group conflict; identifies the main strategic trajectories of development around which a national consensus may be formed; and offers a forecast of changes in the nature of public solidarity, outlining likely scenarios for this process. The report also considers the key causes and factors that may have a positive or negative impact on the level of cohesion between the authorities and citizens, in particular with regard to dialogue between them, the use of information resources to influence public consciousness, and countering external factors aimed at undermining social unity in Ukraine.

On the Institute’s website (in the “Our Publications” section), is available the electronic version of the analytical report “Imperatives of Wartime in the System of State Power”.

The analytical report “Imperatives of Wartime in the System of State Power” is devoted to a comprehensive analysis of the transformations of Ukraine’s system of state power under the conditions of full-scale war. It focuses on changes in the balance between the concentration and dispersion of power and their impact on the preservation of democratic institutions; the mechanisms of political legitimacy in Ukraine in 2022–2025; the functioning of public administration and the problem of bureaucratic competence; as well as the evolution of the justice system and anti-corruption policy under martial law. Particular attention is paid to the transformation of the vertical structure of state governance and to the interaction between military and military-civil administrations and local self-government bodies in the context of decentralization and martial law.

22 січня у Інституті політичних і етнонаціональних досліджень ім. І. Ф. Кураса НАН України відбудеться круглий стіл до Дня Соборності України – «Національні спільноти України –  історичні події та сучасність у загальнодержавному контексті».

Захід організовано спільно з громадською спілкою «Рада національних спільнот України 2025».

Початок круглого столу об 11:00.

Детальніше про захід, учасників круглого столу та теми доповідей за посиланням. 

Програма заходу:

11:30–12:00 Реєстрація учасників;

12:00–12:30 Вітальні слова організаторів та запрошених гостей;

12:30–12:40 Вручення державних нагород представникам різних національних спільнот України;

12:40–14:00 Виступи учасників;

14:00–14:30 Підсумкові дебати та обговорення

Work continues within the framework of the joint Polish–Ukrainian project “The Impact of Types of Political Systems on the Quality of Functioning of Political Institutions: Polish and Ukrainian Experience and Prospects.” The project is being implemented with the participation of leading Polish and Ukrainian scholars, including researchers from the Department of Political Institutions and Processes of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

The first meeting of 2026, held on 15 January at the University of Warsaw, was devoted to the functioning of the judicial system in Ukraine and Poland. A scholarly presentation entitled “Judiciary in Ukraine: The Path to a Fair Trial,” addressing the challenges and prospects of reforming Ukraine’s justice system under conditions of prolonged transformation and full-scale war, was delivered by Svitlana Brekharia, Senior Research Fellow at the Institute and PhD in Political Science.

In her presentation, the researcher emphasized that, despite more than thirty years of independence, the judiciary continues to operate under significant institutional challenges shaped by the Soviet legacy, political interference, and a deficit of public trust. Particular attention was paid to the phenomenon of negative selection within the judicial and law enforcement systems and its impact on the quality of law enforcement. Svitlana Brekharia highlighted the achievements of judicial and anti-corruption reform, including the introduction of mechanisms for judicial accountability, competitive selection procedures, the restoration of the disciplinary function of the High Council of Justice, and the functioning of anti-corruption institutions—the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO), and the High Anti-Corruption Court.

In the presentation “The Erosion of Constitutional Adjudication in Poland and Its Impact on the Protection of Constitutional Rights and Freedoms of the Individual” Professor Monika Flóczak-Wątor of the Jagiellonian University analyzed the transformation of the role of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal in the context of a constitutional crisis. Special attention was devoted to the historical role of the Constitutional Tribunal during the period of systemic transformation, the formation of the principles of a democratic state governed by the rule of law, as well as contemporary manifestations of the politicization of constitutional justice. Professor Monika Flóczak-Wątor emphasized that the erosion of the independence of the Constitutional Tribunal leads to a decline in public trust, restricts citizens’ access to effective constitutional protection, and creates risks for legal certainty.

The presentations were followed by a broad and fruitful discussion involving Ukrainian and Polish scholars, including Professor Galyna Zelenko, Deputy Director of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the NAS of Ukraine; leading research fellows Rostyslav Balaban, Nataliia Kononenko, and Tetiana Liashenko; Senior Research Fellow and Associate Professor Svitlana Sytnyk; Professor Jarosław Flis (Jagiellonian University); Professor Antoni Kamiński (Institute of Political Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences); Professor Agnieszka Dudzińska; and Professor Jacek Zalesny (University of Warsaw).

On 15 January 2026, the I. F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethno-National Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine hosted an interdisciplinary scientific and practical seminar entitled “History in the Political-Psychological Dimension: Personality, Culture, Nation.”

The event was co-organized by the I. F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethno-National Studies of the NAS of Ukraine and the Institute of Social and Political Psychology of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine.

Welcoming remarks were delivered by Mykola Sliusarevskyi, Corresponding Member of the NAES of Ukraine and Director of the Institute of Social and Political Psychology of the NAES of Ukraine, and Yurii Nikolaets, Deputy Director of the I. F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethno-National Studies of the NAS of Ukraine.

Presentations were given by Pavlo Hornostai, Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor, Chief Research Fellow at the Institute of Social and Political Psychology of the NAES of Ukraine, as well as by Yurii Nikolaets, Deputy Director of the I. F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethno-National Studies of the NAS of Ukraine, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor.

Participants emphasized the importance of analyzing the impact of collective memory, identity, trauma, and historical narratives on the formation of political processes, culture, and the nation. Special attention was paid to the interaction of psychological mechanisms—particularly resentment, heroization, and demonization—with historical events and political ideologies, as well as to their role in shaping political decisions and societal orientations.

In the context of the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian war, the seminar highlighted the accelerated transformation of perceptions of the past, present, and future, as well as the growing importance of shared (often traumatic) historical experience as a foundation of national identity. Issues related to the use of historical narratives by political actors for societal mobilization and for constructing images of “friends” and “enemies” were discussed.

Particular attention was devoted to changes in Ukrainian public consciousness as a result of the full-scale military invasion by the Russian Federation. It was noted that the war has fostered an unprecedented level of social solidarity, the growth of volunteer and civic movements, the strengthening of horizontal social ties, and a deeper identification of citizens with the values of freedom, dignity, and justice.

At the same time, participants drew attention to problems of institutional incapacity of the state to fully meet societal demands for the establishment of basic values, particularly in the areas of integrity, the rule of law, and anti-corruption policy.

It was emphasized that under conditions of war, Ukrainian identity has become a crucial factor in the resilience of the state and its subjectivity in the international arena. The growing awareness of belonging to the Ukrainian nation as an inclusive civic community, regardless of ethnic origin, was highlighted.

The participants also noted that the war has led Ukrainians to reconsider their own history, revise established myths and symbols, and, in particular, to the final deconstruction of the imperial myth of “one people,” which Russia had long used as an instrument of political and cultural domination.

The seminar demonstrated the relevance of an interdisciplinary approach to analyzing historical, psychological, and political factors of contemporary transformations in Ukrainian society.

The discussion was attended by staff members of the I. F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethno-National Studies, including Oleksandr Mayboroda, Head of the Department of Global Political Development; Viktor Kotyhorenko, Head of the Department of Ethnopolitology; Maksym Rozumnyi, Head of the Department of Theory and History of Political Science; Pavlo Hai-Nyzhnyk, Doctor of Historical Sciences; Zoreslav Samchuk, Doctor of Philosophical Sciences; Anatolii Podolskyi, Candidate of Historical Sciences; Ivan Leontiev, PhD; as well as representatives of the Institute of Social and Political Psychology of the NAES of Ukraine—Svitlana Chunikhina, Deputy Director; Vadym Vasiutynskyi, Chief Research Fellow of the Department of Psychology of Masses and Communities; Nataliia Dovhan, Head of the Department of Psychology of Political and Legal Relations; Olena Sushii, Head of the Department of Psychology of Masses and Communities; Lidiia Chorna, Head of the Department of Psychology of Small Groups and Intergroup Relations; Olha Volianiuk, Candidate of Political Sciences; Borys Lazorenko, Leading Research Fellow; Olha Diachenko, Acting Head of the Department of Special Fields of Historical Knowledge and Didactics of History at Oles Honchar Dnipro National University; Olha Sviderska, Professor of the Department of Military Political Science at the Military Institute of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, and others.

Galyna Zelenko, Deputy Director of the I. F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnonational Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, completed a four-month internship in a blended format under the Science–Policy Integration program, organized by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (USA) in cooperation with the National Research Foundation of Ukraine.

The program was aimed at developing practical skills for integrating scientific research into public policymaking and fostering effective communication between researchers and public authorities. Twenty-eight experienced Ukrainian scholars from various fields were selected through a competitive process to participate in the course. This was the first Ukrainian cohort to complete the program.

During the course, participants worked on analyzing real policy demands, mastered tools for preparing analytical materials for decision-makers, and learned how to translate complex scientific findings into actionable policy recommendations.

“Celebrating Mark Beissinger” was the title of the international conference at Princeton University on October 23-24, where Dr. Mykola Riabchuk, the Principal Research Fellow at the Department of Political Culture and Ideologies, took part in the opening session discussing the contribution of the prominent American scholar in the study of Ukrainian-Russian relations and the roots and consequences of the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war. During his two-week visit to the U.S. Dr. Riabchuk delivered also a cycle of lectures at several other American Universities, specifically at Columbia, Georgetown, Stanford and UCLA (University of California in Los Angeles).

In his presentations, the speaker outlined the scopes and limits of war-time civic mobilization in Ukrainian society and emphasized the need to fend off the Russian venomous propaganda that has found lately its ways even to the upper echelons of American administration. Russian weaponization of culture should be a primary concern of American scholars who often underestimate the role of soft power turned hard during the war.

The Columbia lecture can be watched online at https://www.youtube.com/live/DBdhmQLeQp0

On December 16, 2025, the State Institution “Institute of World History of the NAS of Ukraine” held the International Scholar Conference “Features of the Formation of the Scientific Discourse on the Holocaust in European Countries”.

The main areas of work of the conference were the following:

1. The phenomenon of the Holocaust and its place in world history.
2. Problems and specifics of Holocaust research in the USSR and post-Soviet space.
3. Features of the formation of modern scientific and socio-political discourse on the Holocaust in Western European countries.
4. Current problems of Holocaust research in Ukraine and the world.

The leading researcher of the Department of Ethnopolitical Science of our Institute, Candidate of Historical Sciences Anatolii Podolskyi, delivered a speech at the conference on the topic “Research and Teaching of the Holocaust History in Ukraine: challenges during a modern war”. The report, in particular, discussed new forms of commemorative practices for honoring the victims of World War II, the experience of perpetuating the memory of war victims, which is now very important for our country during the Russian aggression and war against us.

During conference

The conference was also attended by well-known Ukrainian historians: Professor, Doctor of Historical Sciences Andriy Kudryachenko, Professor, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Oleksandr Lysenko, Professor, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Ihor Sribnyak and others.

On 16 December 2025, a round table entitled “Threats and Risks to National Security in the Sphere of Domestic Policy and the Economy under Conditions of War” was held in Kyiv. The event was organized by the National Institute for Strategic Studies (NISS).

The purpose of the event was to identify key threats and assess risks to national security in the spheres of domestic policy and the economy in the context of the full-scale war, as well as to provide an expert discussion of possible approaches to crisis response. Within the framework of the round table, NISS presented the results of a study on the risks of domestic political destabilization, institutional vulnerability, erosion of legitimacy, and threats to Ukraine’s economic security in 2026. The study was conducted in collaboration with the Finnish company INCLUS, which provided specialized software for risk assessment.

The discussion focused on current challenges to the resilience of the political system, the effectiveness of state institutions, the quality of public policy, and the managerial capacity of the state under conditions of a prolonged war.

The event was attended by researchers from the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, including Deputy Director of the Institute, Doctor of Political Science, Corresponding Member of the NAS of Ukraine Halyna Zelenko, as well as Leading Research Fellows, Candidates of Political Science Nataliia Kononenko and Rostyslav Balaban.

On December 15, in Kyiv, the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnopolitics and Freedom of Conscience (DESS) held a scientific and practical conference entitled “Current Issues in the Activities of DESS”, dedicated to the latest challenges in the fields of ethnopolitics, freedom of conscience, and social cohesion. The event brought together representatives of public authorities, members of parliament, scholars, and international experts for a professional discussion of issues that are particularly relevant for Ukraine in the context of war and European integration.

The conference was structured around three discussion panels and one round table. The speakers focused on the following key issues: the state of ethno-confessional relations; practical aspects of implementing current legislation regulating the activities of religious organizations; the creation of conditions for the harmonious coexistence of various ethnic communities in Ukraine’s multicultural society; and the fulfillment of Ukraine’s international obligations in the context of its movement toward the European Union.

Among the invited participants were members of the DESS Expert Council on Ethnopolitics, including Viktor Kotyhorenko, Head of the Department of Ethnopolitology at the I. F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Doctor of Political Science and Professor, as well as Oleh Kalakura, Chief Research Fellow of the Department of Ethnopolitology, Doctor of Political Science and Professor. They took part in the work of Panel No. 2, “Ethnopolitics and Interethnic Unity of the State under Martial Law: Instruments of Public Management”.

Viktor Kotyhorenko delivered a presentation entitled “On the Contradictions between Legal Regulators and Practices of Ukraine’s Ethnopolitics”, while Oleh Kalakura spoke on “The Peace Plan as a Challenge for Adjusting Ukraine’s Ethnopolitics”.

Participants of the conference expressed confidence that the activities of the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnopolitics and Freedom of Conscience are consistent with the strategy of the Council of Europe and European standards of interethnic interaction.

On November 19, 2025, as part of the Remembrance in Dialogue project, organized by the civic society organizations Insha Osvita and Austausch, a workshop for history teachers was held on researching and teaching local Holocaust histories. The project is dedicated to preserving the memory of the Holocaust vicitims during the Russian war against Ukraine.

The teachers were addressed by Dr. Natalia Lazar (United States Holocaust Museum) on the topic “Teaching the History of the Holocaust Based on Primary Sources and Testimonies: Pedagogical Practices and Recommendations of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum” and by Dr. Anatoly Podolsky, a leading researcher at the Department of Ethnopolitics of our Institute, who presented on the topic “Teaching of the Holocaust History During the War: Methods and Methodologies”. The lecture noted that in Ukraine, during almost four years of Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine, the methodology and techniques of teaching the Holocaust History, the fate of Ukrainian Jews during World War II, and the crimes of National Socialism have changed. These changes relate to the modern war, when many history teachers found themselves in a situation like the events of 85 years ago, and the experience of studying the history of the Holocaust helps to comprehend the events of Russian aggression against our country. The accumulated significant experience in studying, teaching, and preserving the memory of the victims of the Holocaust is now needed to understand the modern war and the future preservation of the memory of this brutal Moscow aggression against Ukraine in the 21st century.

As part of this project, Ukrainian, Polish, and German teams studied together for half a year in lectures and during a visit to Frankivsk and are now to share their knowledge with teaching communities in their countries. The workshop focused on teaching methodologies and approaches to the topic during the war.

During Dr. Anatoly Podolsky lecture

On 4 December 2025, in Kyiv, the presentation of the project (kick-off meeting) “Good Governance Practice: European Experience for Ukraine” (EU Erasmus+ Programme) took place. The project is designed for three years and is aimed at deepening the expertise of learners in the fields of jurisprudence and public administration in accordance with the principles of good governance, as well as at exchanging experience with representatives of the European academic community.

The Coordinator of the Consortium is Dragomanov Ukrainian State University, and the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine is a partner of the project. Also participating in the Consortium are Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University, Berdyansk State Pedagogical University, Nizhyn Mykola Gogol State University, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Kryvorizkyj Nationalnyj Universytet, as well as three foreign higher education institutions: Baltijas Starptautiska Akademija (Latvia), Ekonomicka Univerzita v Bratislave (Slovakia), Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Sklodowskiej (Poland).

The project was presented by the Project Coordinator, the Vice-Rector for International Relations of the Dragomanov Ukrainian State University, PhD in Political Science Vitalii Stashuk. In his introductory remarks, the Project Coordinator emphasized not only the timeliness and relevance of scientific research in the field of public service in Ukraine, but also the particular necessity of taking into account the experience of the EU countries that have been able to successfully adapt the principles of good governance to the norms and practices of public service.

The Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the NAS of Ukraine is represented in the project by Candidate of Political Sciences, Leading Researcher of the Department of Political Institutions and Processes Rostyslav Balaban, and PhD in Political Science, Junior Researcher of the Department of Political Institutions and Processes Igor Symysenko. The staff members noted that the Institute will provide all necessary scientific and organizational support for the successful implementation of the project “Good Governance Practice: European Experience for Ukraine”.

The project is implemented with the financial support of the European Commission.

On 28–29 November 2025, the 4th International Academic Conference “Research on Polish-Ukrainian Interaction named after Henryk Józewski and Vasyl Mudryi” was held in Lutsk. The event was organized by Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University and the Centre for East European Studies of the University of Warsaw.

The conference was attended by Oleh Kalakura, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Chief Research Fellow at the Department of Ethnopolitology, and Mykola Riabchuk, Candidate of Political Sciences, Leading Research Fellow at the Department of Political Culture and Ideology.

The aim of the event was to intensify academic research on the directions of Ukrainian-Polish cooperation in the 20th–21st centuries and on the prospects of Ukrainian-Polish relations across all key spheres: security, European integration, humanitarian and socio-economic.

Mykola Riabchuk and Oleh Kalakura

Mykola Riabchuk served as moderator of the opening and closing sessions, while Oleh Kalakura delivered a presentation during the fifth panel of the conference, which focused on Polish-Ukrainian dialogue during the communist period. He analyzed the situation of the Polish national minority in the Ukrainian SSR during the years of post-Stalinist modernization of the communist regime and its systemic crisis.

Participants of the fifth panel of the conference together with the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, Oleksandr Mishchenko

On 28–29 November 2025, the Ivan Franko National University of Lviv hosted the international academic conference “Political Institutions and Institutional Interactions During and After the War: Ukrainian, European and Global Dimensions.” The event, dedicated to the memory of renowned Ukrainian political scientist Yurii Shveda, brought together researchers and practitioners from more than nine countries, including Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Latvia, and Israel.

Representatives of leading Ukrainian universities and analytical centers also took part in the conference — Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Uzhhorod National University, the Ostroh Academy, Chernivtsi and Kharkiv National Universities, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Kyiv National Economic University, the Carpathian University, the Ukrainian Catholic University, the Razumkov Centre, and other institutions.

The Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine was represented by senior researchers Nataliia Kononenko and Rostyslav Balaban, who presented studies on the state and prospects of political party development in Ukraine.

In his presentation, Rostyslav Balaban focused on the problem of the impossibility of forming classical European-type parties in Ukraine — a consequence of distorted conditions of political competition, weak party institutions, and the influence of oligarchic networks. He emphasized that the war further exacerbates the structural problems of the party system: political forces remain poorly organized, lacking internal democracy and stable ideological platforms.

Nataliia Kononenko devoted her presentation to internal imbalances in the functioning of the parliament and the government, highlighting how these imbalances affect political parties. She noted that the absence of competencies typical of parliamentary-presidential systems within parliamentary factions leads to a decline in the quality of lawmaking, reduced policy-making capacity, and the de facto weakening of parties as bearers of political responsibility. In her view, this represents one of the key structural challenges of Ukrainian politics — parties exist nominally but do not fulfill their classical functions, which complicates institutional modernization.

Over the course of two days, conference participants also discussed issues of digital democracy, institutional capacity, the legitimation of power under wartime conditions, the transformation of political processes, and the search for models capable of ensuring the stability and resilience of democratic institutions.

On November 17-20, 2020, an international seminar for teachers and researchers of the World War II history and the Holocaust history was held at the National Holocaust Museum in Amsterdam. Scholars and Educators from 44 European countries, as well as representatives of research organizations from the USA, took part in the work of such an international seminar. The seminar was organized by the international organization Claims Conference (Conference on Jewish Material Claims against Germany).

Ukraine was represented at this forum by Dr. Anatoly Podolsky, a leading researcher at the Department of Ethnopolitics of our Institute, who presented on the topic “Challenges in the Holocaust Studies during the Russian War against Ukraine”. The speech noted that Ukraine has accumulated significant experience in Holocaust Studies and Holocaust Education for three decades. This issue, the fate of Ukrainian Jews during the years of Nazi crimes, is an integral part of research and teaching of the World War II history in Ukraine. Also, in Ukraine, scholars and educational non-governmental institutions have many years of productive experience in cooperation with the Claims Conference.  

Discussions during the conference

The program will address global and national experiences in combating Holocaust distortion and inversion and advancing Holocaust education and commemoration. Special attention will be given to international cooperation between Holocaust institutions whose representatives will be present at the Conference.

Anatoly Podolsky and Norbert Hinterleitner (Anne Frank House)

Head of the Department of Theory and History of Political Science, Maksym Rozumnyi, took part in the International Scientific Conference “Historical Memory of Ukrainians as a Mode of Formation of National Identity in the Conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian War and the New World Political Reality”, which took place in Lviv on November 12, 2025. The conference was organized by the I. Krypiakevych Institute of Ukrainian Studies of the National Academy of Sciences, with the support of the National Research Foundation of Ukraine, within the framework of the project “Historical Memory of Ukrainians in Conditions of War: From Confrontation to Consolidation”. The curators of the scientific event are Doctor of Historical Sciences Iryna Orlevych and Doctor of Philology Hanna Didyk-Meush (project leader).

The well-known humanities researchers from Ukraine and Poland attended the conference.

Doctor of Political Sciences Maksym Rozumnyi participated in the work of the first section of the conference with a report “War for Identity: the Russian Challenge and the Ukrainian Response.” The sectional meeting was also attended by Dr. of History, Professor Leonid Zashkilnyak (with a report on theoretical issues of modern memory policy in Ukraine), Dr. of Philosophy Lyudmila Filipovych (the topic of the speech was religious and national identity in the context of the contemporary Russian-Ukrainian war), Member of Parliament of Ukraine, Candidate of History Volodymyr Viatrovych (the policy of national memory of Ukraine since 2014), Dr. Lukasz Adamsky (on the topic “Cognitive biases, fallacies and sophisms in the Polish-Ukrainian discussion on historical memory”). The participants in subsequent sectional meetings discussed the issues of national identity policy in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war, as well as various dimensions of historical memory and interpretations of the historical past in folk memory, official narratives, and scientific discourses.

Following the conference, it is planned to publish a collection of materials. The implementation of the project “Historical Memory of Ukrainians in the Context of War: From Confrontation to Consolidation” will continue in 2026.

On 8 November 2025, a seminar within the Polish-Ukrainian project “The Impact of Political System Types on the Quality of Political Institutions: Polish and Ukrainian Experience and Perspectives” took place at Jagiellonian University (Kraków, Republic of Poland).

The delegation of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine included: Deputy Director Prof. Galyna Zelenko, Leading Research Fellows Tetiana Liashenko, Rostyslav Balaban and Nataliia Kononenko, and Senior Research Fellow Svitlana Sytnyk.

The seminar opened with a discussion with Mr. Bogusław Sonik, former Member of the Polish Sejm and the European Parliament. The conversation focused on key stages of democratic transformation in Poland — from the rise of the “Solidarity” movement to the comprehensive reform of local self-government. Particular attention was paid to the role of local communities as an important driver of Poland’s contemporary development.

The second part of the seminar featured a meeting with Mr. Rafał Komarewicz, Member of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland. His presentation emphasized the division of powers between central and local authorities, as well as the need to build effective coordination mechanisms across governance levels. The discussion also addressed the politicization of administrative decisions, the influence of lobbying groups, and the risks these factors pose for consistent implementation of public policies.

The seminar became an important component of the joint research project and contributed to deepening the professional dialogue on adapting European experience to strengthen the institutional capacity of public governance in Ukraine.

On 7 November 2025, as part of the study visit within the Polish-Ukrainian project “The Impact of Political System Types on the Quality of Political Institutions: Polish and Ukrainian Experience and Perspectives”, a meeting was held between project participants and a representative of the Office of the Polish Ombudsman (Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich).

The meeting was attended by researchers from the I. F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine – Deputy Director, Doctor of Political Sciences Halyna Zelenko, Senior Researchers Rostyslav Balaban and Nataliia Kononenko, and Senior Researcher Svitlana Sytnyk.

The Office’s representative, Mr. Matej Kruk, briefed the delegation on the key areas of the Polish Ombudsman’s work and emphasized that the institution’s activities focus on ensuring the effective implementation of the rule of law and fundamental human rights and freedoms. Particular attention is paid to the protection of minority rights, access to justice, and monitoring compliance with pre-trial investigation deadlines.

Mr. Kruk highlighted the Ombudsman’s active cooperation with civil society organizations in monitoring and responding to potential human rights violations. An important part of the institution’s work is also overseeing Poland’s compliance with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and addressing cases of discrimination based on identity. These obligations are embedded in special legislation adopted after Poland joined the European Union.

During the Q&A session, participants discussed mechanisms for protecting the rights of Ukrainians in Poland, cooperation between the Polish Ombudsman and the European Ombudsman, and the specifics of the institution’s work before and after Poland’s accession to the EU.

The meeting became an important part of the study visit program and contributed to strengthening Polish-Ukrainian academic cooperation in the field of political institution research and human rights protection practices.

On November 4, 2025, the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine hosted an expert seminar titled “Transparency and Trust: How to Reform the Civil Service Without Losing Legitimacy.” The event was organized by a number of civil society organizations – the Professional Government Association (PGA), the Reanimation Package of Reforms Coalition (RPR), the Centre of Policy and Legal Reform (CPLR), the Centre for Democracy and Rule of Law (CEDEM), Vox Ukraine, and the Association of Political Sciences of Ukraine (APSU). The seminar served as a platform for professional dialogue among government bodies, the academic community, civil society, and international partners on the renewal of the public service system.

Participants discussed three key directions for future reform: the abolition of lifetime status for politically exposed persons (PEPs), the modernization of financial disclosure, and aligning the remuneration system of civil servants with market standards. Representatives of government institutions – Nataliia Kozlovska (Secretariat of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine), Oleksandr Hladun (NACP), and Kyrylo Klymenko (Accounting Chamber) emphasized the need to coordinate anti-corruption, budgetary, and management decisions within the preparation of the new Public Administration Reform Strategy (2026–2030). They acknowledged that the civil service requires an updated remuneration system, but such changes must go hand in hand with institutional strengthening of the service itself.

Representatives of civil society – Artem Shaipov (PGA), Taras Shevchenko (CEDEM), and Hlib Vyshlinsky (Centre for Economic Strategy, CES) called for avoiding an oversimplified reform through an excessive anti-corruption bias. They stressed that reform should be based on evidence-based policy and take into account public perceptions of fairness. In particular, A. Shaipov called for empirical research on institutional trust, while T. Shevchenko warned about the risks of “anti-corruption maximalism,” which could undermine the motivation of civil servants. Vyshlinsky emphasized that increasing salaries in the public sector is a prerequisite for effective reform, not its consequence.

The academic and expert community – Olena Sushyi (Institute of Social and Political Psychology of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine), Halyna Zelenko, Svitlana Sytnyk, Nataliia Kononenko, Rostyslav Balaban, and Yurii Nikolaets (Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the NAS of Ukraine; members of the Association of Political Sciences of Ukraine) stressed that the success of reforms is measured by the level of public trust, not only by administrative changes. They highlighted the need to restore political responsibility, open communication with citizens, and institutional consistency in political practices. Liudmyla Yuzhva (NDI) drew attention to the importance of the communication component in building trust in the reform process.

European organizations were represented by Ugis Siksna, head of the EU4PAR project, who emphasized that the EU consistently insists on adhering to the principle of risk orientation and international transparency standards in evaluating the performance of the civil service, as well as maintaining a balance between data openness and the protection of civil servants’ privacy.

The discussion demonstrated that the Ukrainian discourse on civil service reform is gradually moving beyond a technocratic approach and acquiring the features of a value-based search for balance between control, trust, and professionalism. The participants agreed that the renewal of the civil service should be based on transparency, evidence, and political responsibility. A reform that preserves legitimacy must become a public contract of trust between the state, society, and international partners.