Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine has been included in the global register of research organizations – Research Organization Registry (ROR).

The ROR was created to identify research organizations and aims to integrate research institutions into the open scientific infrastructure.

The identifier is supported in the metadata of a number of scientific platforms, including Crossref and ORCID.

The ROR is used in journal publishing systems, data repositories (in particular, for state registration and accounting of scientific papers and dissertations in the Ukrinform), platforms that provide international research grants, open access workflows, and other components of the research infrastructure. ROR ID is designed to eliminate ambiguity of institutional affiliation, improve identification and tracking of research conducted by the institution, etc.

ROR ID of the institution:
https://ror.org/0067sfd77

ROR data is free and publicly available in accordance with the requirements of the CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain license.

Use of a unique identifier (ROR ID):

• Ensures correct attribution of scientific institutions, associated researchers, publishers, informative for granting organizations, etc;
• facilitates interaction between different systems, databases and research platforms, facilitating information exchange and collaboration;
• helps to improve the identification and accessibility of research organizations, which contributes to effective interaction and search for partners for cooperation;
• allows for more accurate tracking of scientific results;
• promotes the implementation of international standards for the identification of research organizations, transparency and open access to scientific information, which is important for the development of open science.

From September 30 to October 2, 2024, the University of Regensburg and Think Space Ukraine, with the support of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, held a conference “Shifting Borders, Changing Landscapes: Research on Industrial Regions in Transition”. The conference was devoted to the study of the past and present of the industrial regions of Eastern Europe – Upper Silesia and Donbas. The conference was also aimed at creating a space for a broader dialogue with scholars who study European industrial zones and border areas, and conduct comparative research.

I took part in the conference and delivered a presentation “Donbas vs. Galicia: Different Modes of Othering and Mythologization” by Mykola Riabchuk, a leading researcher at the Department of Political Culture and Ideologies of the Institute. In his presentation, the scholar argued that the othering of both regions was largely based on old Soviet myths, although they were used in different ways. The post-Soviet stereotyping of Galicia was essentially a continuation of old Soviet myths that demonized the region as extremely nationalistic and xenophobic, while in the case of Donbas, the old Soviet myth of the region as a showcase of “developed socialism” was caricatured into its opposite – the embodiment of all possible social pathologies. However, after 2014, the representation of both regions in the public discourse, according to the researcher, has changed significantly due to a deeper understanding of regional peculiarities and their more responsible political interpretation.

University of Regensburg

Prior to the conference, a photo exhibition of works by four prominent artists whose lives are closely connected with Upper Silesia and Donbas was organized for the participants: Viktor Maruschenko (1946-2020), Karolina Jonderko (1985), Oleksandr Chekmenov (1969), and Michal Kala (1948).

On September 26, 2024, the All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Forum was held in Kyiv: „Greeks of Ukraine: Preserving Identity in the Context of Russian Aggression. Socio-political, historical, cultural and linguistic aspects”. The event was initiated by the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience in cooperation with the Federation of Greek Societies of Ukraine and Mariupol State University.

The forum was attended by representatives of Greek communities, government institutions, international organizations and academia, united by a common desire to preserve the centuries-old history and culture of the Greeks in Ukraine. Particular attention was paid to the problems faced by Greeks living in the temporarily occupied territories, given that 85% of Ukrainian Greeks lived in the Ukrainian Northern Pryazov’ye before the war.

The forum was attended by scholars of the Department of Ethnopolitical Science of our Institute: Anastasiia Dehterenko, Leading Research Scientist of the Ethnopolitics Department, PhD (Political Science), Associate Professor and Oleksiy Lyashenko, Researcher, Candidate of Historical Sciences.

In the scientific discussion „The Greeks of Ukraine in the sociopolitical life of Ukraine in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war, their contribution to countering Russian aggression”, Anastasiia Dehterenko, made a presentation on „Ethnopolitical management in the system of resilience of territorial communities of the Ukrainian Northern Pryazov’ye”. Speaking during the scientific discussion, Anastasiia Dehterenko noted that the main goal of the resilience of territorial communities is to preserve the viability of the community, its social, economic, and institutional structure in the face of war. At the same time, resilience is something that needs to be systematically measured and tracked using resilience indices, and to measure ethnopolitical resilience, it is necessary to use a monitoring system of such a resilience tool as ethnopolitical management.

Video recording of the forum

On August 28, 2024, a reading and discussion „Russia – a threat to Europe” with journalists Gesine Dornblüth and Thomas Franke took place in Braunschweig (Germany). The book „Putin’s Poison – Russia’s Attack on European Freedom” was presented. The study was published on September 9, 2024. The most controversial issues were the insidious and sophisticated methods used by the Russian regime to infiltrate the societies of Armenia, Georgia, Ukraine and the Baltic States, as well as to threaten Europe. Christoph Giesa moderated the discussion.

Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine was represented by leading researcher, PhD in Political Science, Associate Professor Anastasiia Dehterenko, who has been fruitfully cooperating with the Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit and the Gerda Henkel Stiftung for the second year in a row.

The discussion „Russia as a Threat to Europe” was supported by the Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit, which offers political education programmes in Germany and around the world based on the ideas of liberalism and encourages people to participate in political life through events and publications actively. The foundation was founded on May 19, 1958, is headquartered in Potsdam with offices throughout Germany, and is engaged in political dialogue with more than 60 countries.

As part of the scientific discussions in Braunschweig and Berlin on August 28–30, 2024, Anastasiia Dehterenko also gave lectures on «Protection and Inclusion of New Waves of War Refugees: Risks and Opportunities» and conducted an information campaign on the protection and inclusion of new waves of Ukrainian refugees within the framework of cooperation with the NGO „Ukraine Resilience Development Academy” and with the financial support of the Ukrainian Women’s Fund.

On the 5^th of September, Dr. Mykola Riabchuk, a Principal Research Fellow at the Department of Political Culture and Ideology, delivered a keynote lecture at the opening ceremony of regional IPS conference – the summit of the Central and East European alumni of the International Parliamentary Scholarship Program of the German Bundestag. The site for the conference in two borderland cities – Suceava and Chernivtsi (Stefan cel Mare University in Romania and Yuri Fedkovych University in Ukraine) – were chosen to facilitate the trip for Ukrainian participants and to enable the reciprocal visit of foreigners (upon their consent) to Ukraine.

In his lecture, entitled “Reshaping the Global Order in the 21st Century – Challenges for Democratic Resilience in Central and Eastern Europe and Beyond” Dr. Riabchuk emphasized the exceptional importance of Ukraine’s currents resistance to Russian aggression and its victory (or defeat) for both the eventual global order (or, alternatively, complete disorder) and for the triumph (or collapse) of democratic principles in the region and elsewhere.

Mykola Ryabchuk speaks

On the same day, he took part in a panel discussion with the German MP from the Green Party Robin Wagener and Ukrainian Ambassador to Romania Ihor Prokopchuk on “Democracies in Central and Eastern Europe – the Results of Their Development since 1989-1991 and Stability Today”. In his brief intervention, Dr. Riabchuk stressed the importance of the liberal component in true democracy, neglect of which often results in ochlocracy and populism.

On August 23, 2024, Head of the Department of Political Institutions and Processes, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Galyna Zelenko, gave a scientific report “Institutional capacity of Ukraine in conditions of war” at the meeting of the Presidium of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

In her report, G. I. Zelenko presented the results of a three-year study of the Department of Political Institutions and Processes.

SIGMA and Worldwide Governance Indicators, Fragile State Index, etc. were used to analyze the institutional capacity of the state.

In her speech, G.I. Zelenko noted that indices of the state’s institutional capacity in Ukraine began to decline even before the great war in 2021. While the regression during the war is insignificant, that, in combination with social self-organization, explains why Ukraine survived the first years of the war.

Meeting of the Presidium of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

But for the most part, in her speech, G. I. Zelenko focused on the analysis of “traps of failure”. According to the researcher’s conclusion, they are established in Ukraine at the formal-institutional level, namely, teleological (tentative) constitutionalism involves the adoption of procedural laws that would make it possible to implement the norms of the constitution. However, in Ukraine, they were either not adopted, or were adopted with great delay (the Law on the Cabinet of Ministers, on the Impeachment of the President, on the Regulations of the VRU were adopted more than 10 years later, while there are no laws on the President of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine at all).

After all, Ukraine has an absolutely unbalanced system of public power, in particular, an underdeveloped mechanism of checks and balances. And if there is a legal vacuum, it is filled with illegal practices.

Galyna Zelenko is speaking

In Ukraine, in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the process of primary capital accumulation was largely completed thanks to the voucher privatization model. As a result, FPGs were formed in Ukraine and Ukraine received the “capture state” phenomenon. Further, the logic of the political process was subordinated to the preservation of the status quo of the FPG, which turned out to be the actual source of power in the state, and not the people, as is commonly believed. The impossibility of influencing the authorities in a conventional way (due to non-working tools of political participation) also caused the Maidans.

After all, now the main “traps of failure” are as follows:

– a completely broken government (problem of dual subordination) and a destructive vote of no confidence, which means that even if the government is given a two, it cannot be automatically dismissed;

– a half-accepted government (the government works without a program, which is absolute nonsense for European practice), which means that there is no document by which the parliament can evaluate the effectiveness of the government’s work;

– the absence of a regulated status of the parliamentary opposition and the unregulated activity of the parliamentary coalition, which causes parliamentary corruption and parliamentary groups “for sale”;

– the conditional effect of the imperative mandate, and hence the impossibility of punishing deputies for frank collaborationism, activities that pose a threat to national security. After all, there is no procedure for such cases.

– the absence of a rule on mandatory party affiliation of the minister, which erodes the political responsibility of the ruling coalition;

– the absence of a rule on the report of ministers to the parliament in the event of their dismissal, which eliminates the political responsibility of both the cabinet and the parliament;

– a destructive vote of no confidence in the government, when recognizing the government’s work as unsatisfactory does not mean its automatic resignation, and therefore government crises due to the long procedure of forming governments are programmed automatically;

– an absolutely ineffective institution of political parties – that is, in essence, there is no one to perform the function of mediation between society and the government.

As a result, the institution of political responsibility in general has completely failed. And therefore, with such a system of government organization, Ukraine will not be able to fully move towards the EU, because the system of government organization will come into conflict with the standards and practices of the EU; nor maintain the appropriate level of legitimacy and capacity of the authorities to wage war against the Russian Federation.

On 12-15 August 2024, the General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) took place at University College Dublin (Ireland).

The European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) is an independent academic association founded in 1970. The Consortium was initiated by Jean Blondel and Stein Roccan. Together with Peter de Janosi of the Ford Foundation and other prominent European scholars, they developed and implemented the concept of the European Consortium for the Promotion of Political Science. Twelve European universities founded the ECPR. Today, ECPR has 350 institutional members from nearly 50 countries. The organization includes leading universities and tens of thousands of scholars and students engaged in research and teaching of political science.

The annual General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research is a significant scientific event aimed at developing research in all areas of political science. Due to its comprehensive coverage and inclusive approach, it allows scholars from different continents and countries to come together and present and discuss the results of their research work.

The General Conference, which took place on 12-15 August 2024, brought together more than 2,500 participants at University College Dublin (Ireland) and on the online platform of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference. This year, there were 61 sections and about 500 panels discussing the most pressing issues of political science.

For the second year in a row, the Ukrainian research institution Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine was represented at the General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR).

This year, the research of scientists from Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine was presented at the section „International migration: Policies and politics”. The panel „Protection and inclusion, or return to the country of origin of new waves of refugees: risks and opportunities” was moderated by the scientists of the Department of Ethnopolitics of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine: Anastasiia Dehterenko – Leading Research Scientist of the Ethnopolitics Department, PhD (Political Science), Associate Professor (Chair of the Panel), Oleksiy Lyashenko – Researcher, Candidate of Historical Sciences (Co-Chair of the Panel), Lyudmyla Mazuka – Senior Researcher, Candidate of Historical Sciences (Moderator of the Panel) and Oleg Kalakura – Chief Researcher, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor (Moderator of the Panel).

The panel „Protection and inclusion, or return to the country of origin of new waves of refugees: risks and opportunities” was held online on 13 August 2024 on the platform of the General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) at University College Dublin (Ireland).

The following reports were presented by Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine:

• „The cultural segment of preserving the identity of Ukrainian refugees from the war in Ukraine’s ethnic policy”, Paper Author & Paper Presenter – Oleg Kalakura;
• „Protection and inclusion of new waves of refugees from the war: risks and opportunities”, Paper Author & Paper Presenter – Anastasiia Dehterenko;
• „State structure and ethnopolitical resilience of Ukraine: historical retrospective and political impacts”, Paper Author & Paper Presenter –Oleksii Liashenko;
• „Assimilation or return: how to ensure children’s freedom of choice”, Paper Author & Paper Presenter – Liudmyla Mazuka.

Back in March 2024, the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) invited the international academic community to discuss international migration issues at the University of Lüneburg (Germany). A total of 450 scholars from different countries were invited to participate in the joint seminar session on 25–28 March 2024.

During the seminar „Attractive States, Desirable Migrants: Examining Immigration Promotion Policies” (https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/WorkshopDetails/14436) within the framework of the joint seminar session of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) at the University of Lüneburg in Germany from 25 to 28 March 2024 (Lüneburg, Germany), a research by Leading Research Scientist of the Ethnopolitics Department, PhD (Political Science), Associate Professor at Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Anastasiia Dehterenko was presented.

The study „The Ukrainian «desirable» immigrants targeted by state promotion in EU: risks, opportunities and prospects” was conducted and presented at a workshop as part of a joint research project and with the financial support of the Gerda Henkel Foundation (Germany).

From August 13 to 17, 2024, the annual scientific and educational seminar-school “Holocaust History: Study, Teaching, Memory” was held in Kyiv, organized by the Ukrainian Center for the Study of the History of the Holocaust in cooperation with the Yad Vashem Memorial (Jerusalem). The participants of the seminar-school were teachers of history and social disciplines of educational institutions from 13 regions of the country.

Lectures were given at the school-seminar by Anatoliy Podolskiy, a leading researcher of the Department of Ethnopolitics of our Institute, Candidate of Historical Sciences, and Head of the Department of Political Culture and Ideology, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Yuriy Nikolaiets.

Anatoliy Podolskiy is speaking

Anatoliy Podolskiy in his lesson on the topic “The relevance of learning about the history of the Holocaust during the Russian-Ukrainian war” drew attention to the fact that historians and educators in Ukraine today, in order to understand the behavior and crimes of the modern Russian political regime, during the Russian aggression against Ukraine should compare the crimes of dictatorial regimes and totalitarian ideologies of the last century, in particular Stalin’s communism and Hitler’s National Socialism. Comparative studies will help to understand the nature of the aggressor country, which is now opposing us and aims to destroy our statehood, Ukrainian cultural and political identity. It is obvious that the hatred of the sovereignty of Ukraine, the Ukrainophobia of Putin’s criminal regime have their origins in totalitarian ideologies of centuries ago.

Yuriy Nikolaiets is speaking

 Yuriy Nikolaiets in his lectures “Crimes of Nazism, Communism and Rashism in Modern Scientific and Journalistic Discourse” emphasized that the crimes of fascists and communists are rooted in the idea of ​​the former greatness of the state and the prospects for realizing its geopolitical interests, and the asymmetric dissemination of information contributes to the formation of ideas about crimes, their scope and consequences and is a prerequisite for the development of criminal behavior practices of the future. The appearance of modern rashism, as a type of fascist ideology, is connected with the large-scale economic lag of the Russian Federation from the leading countries of the world and the desire of its leaders to ensure the realization of certain economic interests through the spread of the “Russian peace”, including through the conduct of hostilities.

During five days, participants had the opportunity to take part in lectures, discussions, trainings, discuss various aspects of the history of the Holocaust in Ukraine and Europe, the politics of totalitarian regimes, Ukrainian-Jewish relations in the interwar period and during the Holocaust, features of the ideology of Nazi anti-Semitism, interdisciplinary approaches to the history of the Holocaust, other genocides of the Second World War and modern times, issues of historical memory, the influence of Russia’s war against Ukraine on the research and memory of the Holocaust, other relevant topics.

Participants of the school seminar

August 16, 2024 at the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, a round table was held “Separatist movements of Catalonia and Donbass: threat assessments in the context of modern state building”.

The co-organizers of the event were the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Center for Historical Research “RIPOLLET” (Spain), Central State Archive of Higher Authorities and Administration of Ukraine, GS “Institute of Strategic Research and Security”.

Scientists from the Institute of Ukrainian History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, the National Academy of the Security Service of Ukraine, the National Academy of Internal Affairs, the State University of Trade and Economics, Cherkasy National University, other scientific institutions and educational institutions took part in the work of the round table.

Welcome speech by Oleksandr Mayboroda

The President of the RIPOLLET Historical Research Center (Spain), Eduard Ballesteros, PhD (“The Movement for the Independence of Catalonia: Trajectories and Debates on Spanish Democracy”), Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Director of the Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Administration of Ukraine Larisa Levchenko (“Attempts to create autonomies in the East of Ukraine: historical experience of 1917 and 2014”), Doctor of Political Science, Professor, chief researcher of the Department of Political Institutions and Processes of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the NAS of Ukraine Vasyl Kozma (“Degradation of Donetsk territorial patriotism and the development of separatist movements: causes and nature”), Director of the Institute of Strategic Studies and Security, Phd Pavlo Lysyansky (“External factors in the organization of separatist movements in Donetsk and Luhansk Region in the 1990s–2000s”), Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Political Culture and Ideology Department of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Yuriy Nikolaiets (“The role of the media in the organization of separatist movements in Donbas in the 1990s-2000s”) made speeches during the round table. The Candidate of Political Sciences, leading researcher of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the NAS of Ukraine Rostyslav Balaban was a moderator of the meeting.

During the work of the round table

The participants of the round table noted the fundamental difference between the situation in Catalonia and the territory of the Ukrainian Donbass. Emphasis was placed on the fact that the separatist movements of Donbas were organized with the active assistance of the Russian Federation.

During the discussion, it was noted that the majority of the ethnically Russian population of the Ukrainian Donbas did not see its future as part of the Russian Federation in 2014. The majority of residents of Donetsk and Luhansk regions advocated the preservation of these regions as part of Ukraine and expressed outrage that the Ukrainian authorities and law enforcement agencies made too little effort to eliminate separatist centers.

During the discussion

The nature of the actions of law enforcement agencies during the illegal referendum in Catalonia sparked the discussion. Scientists also expressed slightly different views on the prospects of punishing all participants of the separatist movement in Donbas.

Condemnation caused the spread of theses about “bandit Donbas” by certain political forces of the “orange camp” in the early 2000s. Labeling the citizens of the entire region as criminals was certainly outside the legal field, but this did not stop those interested in spreading relevant information.

Scientists agreed that the long-term reintegration of the region will be complicated, since many of its residents took direct part in the hostilities against Ukraine as part of illegal armed formations and the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. It was also possible to reach an agreement on the issue of the impracticality of the post-war reconstruction of the destroyed monofunctional settlements of Donbas.

Participants of the round table

On August 5, 2024, an online presentation of the scientific project “Bykivnia, Babyn Yar, Bucha — between the massacre and its memory” took place. The project will focus on research on the crimes of communism, Nazism and rashism in Ukraine.

During the presentation of the new research project, Anatoliy Podolskiy, a leading researcher of the Department of Ethnopolitics of our Institute, Candidate of Historical Sciences, spoke. In his speech, the scientist emphasized that today it is important not only to compare the crimes of the three dictatorial regimes, but also to explain their nature, under which circumstances there is a real opportunity for mass murders and their justification. This project shows that it is possible and worthwhile to compare two totalitarian regimes of the 20th century without diminishing the memory of either of them, and it is also worth analyzing rashism in the context of communism and Nazism. A. Podolskiy also focused on the historical context of Nazi crimes in Babyn Yar during World War II and the German occupation of Ukraine.

During the event, a website was presented on which, in the format of stories about three places of memory in Kyiv and its surroundings – about burials in Bykivna, Babyn Yar and Bucha – the crimes of the three occupation regimes on the territory of Ukraine were revealed: communism, Nazism, rashism. At first, the site will be available in Ukrainian, with English and German versions coming soon.

During the presentation of the project, the following also spoke:

Anton Drobovych, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Head of the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance, Ihor Konkolevskyi, Professor, Director of the Center for Historical Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Berlin, Roman Podkur, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Senior Researcher of the Department of History of State Terror of the Soviet Era, Institute of the History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Head of the National Rehabilitation Commission, Larisa Yakubova, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Head of the Department of History of Ukraine 20-30 years of the 20th century of the Institute of the History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, corresponding member of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Iryna Ozarynska, artist, performer, author of the silent book “The Triangle of Evil: Communism, Nazism, Rashism”, Svitlana Lyakhovets, author of the idea and project coordinator, head of the NGO Svitarta, Tetyana Sheptytska, Candidate of Philological Sciences, deputy general director for scientific work of the National Historical and Memorial Reserve “Bykivnian Graves”, Ihor Bartkiv, head of the Archive Department of the Buchansk City Council.

The discussion was moderated by Nadiya Goncharenko, a senior researcher at the Institute of Cultural Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

During the discussion

The following issues were discussed during the discussion:

• reinterpretation of totalitarian regimes in the European culture of memory, in particular, including the crimes of communism and rashism;
• perception of communism, Nazism and rashism through the prism of humanistic values;
• coverage and condemnation of the crimes committed by the Nazi and communist totalitarian regimes in Ukraine, as well as the crimes of their successors – the Rashists;
• impunity of evil as a guarantee of its reproduction on a larger scale;
• the names and faces of killers who thought they would remain hidden;
• empathy for victims, regardless of the length of time of the crimes committed against them.

The project is implemented by the NGO Svitarta with the support of the EVZ Foundation

Project partners:

• Ukrainian Institute of National Memory
• Zentrum für Historische Forschung Berlin
• Lietuvos istorijos institutas
• Branch archive of the Security Service of Ukraine
• Memorial reserve “Bykivnia graves”
• National Historical and Memorial Reserve “Babyn Yar”
• Archive Department of the Buchan City Council

The Department of Political Institutes and Processes of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the Association of Political Sciences of Ukraine conducted a study “Instruments of legitimation of power during the period of martial law”. The purpose of the research is to identify and analyze the tools that can be used (according to the current legislation) to maintain trust in domestic political institutions under the conditions of “prolonged” (during the martial law regime) electoral legitimation in order to preserve democracy in Ukraine. By “legitimate democratic political regime” we understand a system with a high level of support and recognition by citizens of the activities of power structures (parliament, president, government, local self-government bodies), which guarantees maximum compliance with laws and democratic procedures, the implementation of which is not limited by the relevant law on the introduction of military state in Ukraine.

The scientific tasks of the research include:

• A matrix of factors shaping the general legitimacy of institutions of public power has been developed. The approach to assessing the level of legitimacy in democracies by M. Stephen Weatherford was used, which was supplemented by the authors of this study taking into account the Ukrainian context
• The basic tools of legitimation of such institutions as the president (10 tools), the parliament (11 tools), the government (11 tools), local self-government bodies (12 tools) are singled out, the use of which is not limited to the legal regime of martial law in Ukraine
• The level of experts’ understanding of the importance and application of specific legitimation tools of each of the researched institutions, the implementation of which is able to support the development of the Ukrainian political system in the direction of democracy, even in the conditions of full-scale aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, is determined. The method is an online survey of experts in the period from May 12 to June 15, 2024. 261 experts participated in the survey, of which 76% are scientists (political scientists, lawyers, sociologists, economists, public administration specialists)
• According to experts, there are gaps between the importance of tools and the level of their implementation
• Averaged levels of importance and application of legitimation tools (according to expert evaluations) were established for each institute, clustered into the following thematic groups: “normative-legal”, “practical-instrumental” and “communicative” (according to the approach of R. Amossi)
• A wide selection of tools is offered, the comprehensive introduction of which can improve the management system and the practice of inter-institutional relations in the country in wartime conditions, as well as after the renewal of electoral procedures.

Among the basic conclusions of the study:

• The most important features of a legitimate modern government institution in Ukraine are citizens’ trust in it, its ability to guarantee security and real efficiency, carried out within the limits of the Constitution (according to experts’ assessments)
• The development of national security policy, conducting foreign policy activities, and guaranteeing compliance with the Constitution are very important tools for legitimizing the institution of the president during martial law. According to experts, the most important practices for the legitimation of the parliament are its clear and transparent observance of law-making procedures, the formation of the government and the implementation of parliamentary control over it, as well as the demonstration of deputy integrity. The top tools of the government’s legitimation (in terms of importance) are the trust in it of international partners, its clear public communication and the realization of the responsibility of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine before the Verkhovna Rada. As for local self-government bodies, for their legitimation, according to experts, such tools as fair use of local budgets by self-government bodies, communication with territorial communities and effective resolution of local issues/problems are very important
• Most of the identified legitimization tools for all institutions were classified by experts as “rather important” and “very important”, while their use by the parliament, government and local government in conditions of full-scale war was recognized by experts as mostly irregular. The smallest (but still quite large) gap in expert assessments of the importance of legitimization tools and their practical application at the presidential institute
• According to experts, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine uses, among the clustered tools of legitimation, first of all the tools of the practical group. While the most important, according to experts, for maintaining the legitimacy of the parliament today are the tools of the regulatory and legal group. In order to maintain a high level of legitimization of the institutions of the government and the president, according to experts, the tools of the practical group are the most important. The tools of the same group, according to experts, are those that are used more often than others by the CMU and the President. The problem of such “coincidence” is the presence of large gaps between the assessments of the importance and application of the tools (especially in the government case).
• Even the transition to the thorough implementation of the tools of legitimation of the existing institutions should not negate the need to improve the legislation regulating the institutional design of the political system of Ukraine, which needs changes. Preparation for the redesign of the country’s political system should actively take place at the level of scientific and expert discussion during the legal regime of martial law.

On October 1, 2024, the editorial board of the journal “Political Studies” completed the acceptance of manuscripts for publication in # 2 (8)’ 2024.
Full texts of accepted articles will be published by November 30, 2024.

The journal is published twice a year.

Information on the acceptance of manuscripts for the next issue of the journal (№ 1 (9)’ 2025) and requirements for manuscripts will be posted on the Institute’s website in the “Announcements” section in December 2024.

Articles are published on a free and non-paid basis.

Requirements for manuscripts of articles

E-mail address of the editorial office: editor_ipiend@ukr.net

The 20^th annual Warsaw East European Conference (WEEC) with the headline topic “How to Deter Russia: Resilience of Ukraine and the Western Community” was held at the Center of East European Studies of Warsaw University on July 1–3.

On its second day, Dr. Mykola Riabchuk, a Principal Research Fellow of the Department of Political Culture and Ideology of our institute and a long-time member of the program council of WEEC, moderated the panel on “Media Under Siege: Tackling Disinformation and Propaganda” and, at the end, he took part in the concluding discussion on “The Future of Ukraine: Resilience, Internal Stability, European Integration”.

In his presentation, he focused primarily on the problem of rule of law (rather than “rule by law”), that has not been solved in Ukraine within the past thirty years, and argued that no other problems can be effectively tackled without the proper solution of that crucial one. First of all, he averred, the legal conditions – judiciary, law-enforcement, anti-corruption – strongly determine economic development, direct foreign investment in particular, and secondly, they largely influence public trust in state institutions, enhance (or undermine) social stability and disable (or enable) external propagandistic manipulations.

During the discussion

Conference program

On June 13–14, Dr. Mykola Riabchuk, a Principal Research Fellow of the Department of Political Culture and Ideology of our Institute, took part in a two-day international conference “Language Ideologies in the Successor States of the USSR – Soviet Legacies and New Developments” at the University of Giessen.

In his presentation, titled “«Language of Our Defenders»: (De)legitimization of Russian During the War”, he defined the language situation in Ukraine as still quite ambiguous, resulting from both the ambivalent character of Ukrainian post-Soviet society and from ambiguous policies of all the subsequent governments.

Mykola Ryabchuk reports

The 2014 Russian invasion and, especially, the all-out war launched in 2022 did not put an end to that ambivalence, though substantially limited its scope and scale. While the protracted struggle between the “Ukrainophone” and “Rusophone” ideologies in Ukraine seems to be won by the former, the so called “centrist” ideology that downplays the significance of language issue and effectively supports the postcolonial status-quo, still enjoys popularity in Ukrainian society and may successfully compete with the “Ukrainophone” ideology in the future. Russian language, ostracized and delegitimized in public usage as the language of the aggressor state, is re-legitimized, paradoxically, in private usage as a “language of our defenders”, i.e. language of thousands of Russian-speaking patriots of Ukraine who defend their country from Russian aggression. As long as the public and private spheres are clearly separated and the official use of Ukrainian is strictly observed, the “peaceful co-existence” of two language looks possible, even though some tension might be unavoidable.

Mykola Ryabchuk among the conference participants

The conference program

On June 27, 2024, at the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine held a round table presentation of the results of the scientific study “Adaptive changes in the political field of Ukraine in the conditions of war”.

In his opening speech, Director of the Institute, Vice-President of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Oleg Rafalskiy, emphasized the relevance of the investigated problem and the results of the study, which contains a detailed analysis of the changes taking place in the political field of Ukraine under the influence of the war unleashed by Russia. Emphasis is placed on the importance of the political analysis carried out by scientists of the activities of the key institutions of the political system: in the mode of its functioning, in the institutions of parliamentarism, the presidency, executive and judicial branches of power. An important research direction is the analysis of modern social and political processes, the search. The mentioned and other issues are part of the political science subjects, which are the subject of the conducted analysis, the results of which are presented on the pages of the collective monograph.

Oleg Rafalskiy is speaking

In continuation of the presentation, Head of the Department of Political Institutions and Processes, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Galyna Zelenko, noted that the author team focused on the key aspects of political changes in Ukraine caused by the conditions of martial law – on functional changes in the country’s political system, on new formats of relations between government and society, on innovations in the implementation of the Euro-Atlantic course of the Ukrainian state. The subject area of ​​the analysis of changes in the country is the functioning of political and power institutions, the nature of political governance in accordance with the activation of social processes in the spiritual, cultural, ethnopolitical spheres, and the search for ways to integrate Ukraine into the global democratic space.

During the work of the round table

During the round table, the project executors gave short presentations of their sections:

– “Transformation of the political regime in Ukraine during full-scale Russian armed aggression” (Galyna Zelenko, Head of the department, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, corresponding member of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine);

– “The problem of the institutional capacity of the parliament during the war” (Vitaliy Pereveziy, scientific secretary of the Institute, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor);

– “Structural and functional changes of executive power” (Svitlana Sytnyk, senior researcher, Candidate of Political Sciences, Associate Professor);

– “Political aspects of changes in the judicial branch of the Ukrainian government” (Svitlana Brekharya, senior researcher, Candidate of Political Sciences);

– “Moral and psychological unity of Ukrainians in repelling Russian armed aggression” (Yuriy Shaihorodskyi, Deputy Director of the Institute, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor);

– “Management mechanisms for preventing political radicalism and strengthening political consensus” (Nataliya Kononenko, leading researcher, Candidate of Political Sciences);

– “Ethnopolitics during the war” (Viktor Kotygorenko, Head of the department, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor);

– “War and crystallization of the Euro-Atlantic vector of Ukraine” (Oleksandr Mayboroda, Deputy Director of the Institute, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, corresponding member of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine);

– “Mechanisms of public diplomacy in the formation of international support for Ukraine” (Leonid Kiyanitsa, senior researcher, Candidate of Political Sciences);

– “Securitization of the socio-political space of Ukraine in the face of armed aggression” (Maxym Kyjak, senior researcher, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences).

Scientists of our Institute took part in the work of the round table and spoke: Chief Researcher, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor Vasyl Kozma, Leading Researcher, Candidate of Political Sciences Rostyslav Balaban, Leading Researcher, Candidate of Historical Sciences Anatoliy Podolskiy, Leading Researcher, Senior Researcher employee, Candidate of Political Sciences Iryna Ovchar, and others. More than 30 guests joined the discussion of the research topic online. Among them are employees of scientific institutions, teachers of higher education institutions, representatives of the media and public organizations.

On June 20, 2024, the round table “Ukraine – Hungary: current state and prospects of interstate relations” was held, organized by the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the NAS of Ukraine. The following also participated in the preparation and holding of the event: The National Institute for Strategic Studies, Uzhgorod National University, Ferenc Rakoczi Transcarpathian Hungarian Institute, Transcarpathian Regional Center for Socio-Economic and Humanitarian Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Razumkov Center, Association of Political Sciences of Ukraine, Ukrainian Academy of Political Sciences.

The purpose of the event was a scientific and expert evaluation of the current state and ways of strengthening the strategic partnership between Ukraine and Hungary in the conditions of and after the Russian-Ukrainian war, devoid of political bias.

The professional discussion revolved around ethnopolitical aspects of Ukrainian-Hungarian interstate relations, issues of temporary protection of Ukrainian refugees from the war, economic and military-technical cooperation between the two countries, as well as the role of Ukrainian-Hungarian relations in ensuring security on the European continent.

The Director of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Oleg Rafalskiy addressed the participants of the round table. He emphasized the importance and relevance of the event, stressing that the issues of modern relations between the two neighboring states require in-depth scientific analysis, because their strategic partnership is inevitable, and in the future it will develop within the framework of the European Union and joint security structures.

Screenshot

Oleg Rafalskiy

Viktor Yelenskiy, head of the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnopolitics and Freedom of Conscience, spoke about the achievements and problems of the ethnopolitical vector of interstate cooperation.

Victor Yelenskiy

President of the Razumkov Center, editor-in-chief of the magazine “National Security and Defense” Yuriy Yakymenko singled out the most urgent, in his opinion, questions that need answers and which are aimed at ensuring the national interests of both countries, European and global security.

Yuriy Yakymenko

Scientists who worked in the conference hall of the Institute, as well as scientists who joined online, took part in the discussion. Among the participants are employees of the event’s organizing institutions, as well as scientists from other research centers of Ukraine and Hungary.

Cilla Fedynets

The Hungarian side was directly represented in Kyiv by Ph.D., senior employee of the Center for Social Sciences of the Hungarian Research Network Cilla Fedynets, online – associate professor of the Department of Economics and Management of Janos Kodolanyi University (Budapest) Botond Geza Kalman. The discussion attracted the attention of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Hungary for the Development of Good Neighbor Policy, the head of the Hungarian delegation of the Mixed Hungarian-Ukrainian Commission on Ensuring the Rights of National Minorities, Ferenc Kolmar.

During the discussion

Employees of the staff of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, in particular, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, also showed interest in the discussion.

Scientific evaluations, conclusions and proposals will find their coverage in the collection of materials of the round table and will be directed to specialized institutions of state power.

Round table program

Television story about a scientific event (news program “Details”)

On June 20–22, 2024, the II International Scientific and Practical Conference “Transformative Processes of Social and Humanitarian Education in Modern Ukraine in the Conditions of War: Challenges, Problems and Prospects” was held, which brought together 188 scientists from Ukraine, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Austria, Germany and the USA. The organizer of the conference was the Faculty of Social and Humanities of the West Ukrainian National University. Co-organizers are eight foreign institutions of higher education.

The member of the scientific committee of the conference was the Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Tetyana Bevz – chief researcher of the Department of Theory and History of Political Science of our Institute. She spoke at the plenary session with the report “Identity and stability of Ukrainian society in the conditions of war: dynamics, influences and prospects”.

Tetyana Bevz is performing

 The speaker noted that with the beginning of a full-scale war caused by Russia’s armed aggression, the national identity of Ukrainians became an important source of social stability. The existential threat contributed to strengthening the sense of civic belonging among different ethnic, linguistic and regional groups. Ukraine demonstrated resilience as its citizens, defense forces, government and residents of occupied towns and villages united against the invasion. This resilience grows out of a previously formed strong national self-perception, where belonging to the Motherland prevails over ethnic or linguistic differences. Language, history and culture are key markers of identity. And also – the stability of the Ukrainian people. Ukrainians have proven that they are a stress-resistant nation. The resilience of Ukrainians in the war with the Russian Federation inspires the whole world.

During the conference

The initiative of representatives of Ukrainian civil society “National Platform of Sustainability and Cohesion”, the speaker noted, identified five factors that underlie Ukrainian sustainability: self-organization in all its forms; self-defense; social cohesion; values ​​- inner freedom and human dignity, as red lines that cannot be crossed – and total creativity, innovation.

Tetyana Bevz emphasized that stability is manifested in 1) a common goal – victory in the war; 2) faith in Victory (confidence in it is unchanging); 3) the system of values, which is aimed at preserving a dignified life (81% of Ukrainians noted that the greatest value for them is life, 79% – dignity); 4) a strong support network in the community; 5) trust in the authorities; 6) respect for one’s culture and the culture of others; 6) in the ability to cope with life’s challenges (under conditions of war, Ukrainians study, look for new ways to support their own business, make plans); 7) change in language preferences (Ukrainians abandon Russian in favor of the Ukrainian language as a symbol of resistance); 8) democracy and freedom. Further development of democracy is an important factor in the sustainability formula.

The report aroused the lively interest of the participants of the event, and received many favorable reviews.

Conference program

On June 20, 2024, the First International Financial Forum “Modern Finances: Global Challenges and Modern Trends” began at the Western Ukrainian National University (Ternopil). Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies acted as one of the co-organizers of this large-scale scientific gathering, which was attended by a wide range of domestic and foreign experts, representatives of authorities, the scientific and educational community, and more than a hundred participants from Ukraine and many European countries.

Vice-president of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, director of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies, academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Oleg Rafalskiy addressed the participants of the forum with a welcome speech. Congratulating the participants of the forum on behalf of the Presidium of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the staff of the Institute, he noted that the organizers of the event first of all set themselves the task of establishing communication between representatives of the scientific environment and business, state authorities and the banking sector. The quality of the discussion, its multidimensionality will depend on the pluralism of views that will be presented in it. Therefore, the participation in the forum of political scientists who, among other things, investigate the institutional capacity of state institutions and the policies implemented by them, in particular in the financial and economic sector, is not accidental.

Oleg Rafalskiy

Oleg Rafalskiy expressed his confidence that the establishment of such a discussion platform is a significant contribution of scientists and practitioners of the financial sphere to the quality of Ukrainian politics and, ultimately, to political stability in the state.

During the work of the Forum

Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine – noted O. Rafalskiy – is honored to be among the founders of this forum.

Program of the event

June 12-13, 2024 at the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine International Scientific and Methodological Seminar “History of Genocides in Ukraine: Study of Experience and Contemporary Challenges” was held.

The organizers of the event were the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, the Ukrainian Center for the Study of the History of the Holocaust and the Shoah Memorial (Memorial de la Shoah) in Paris.

The purpose of the event was a professional discussion of Ukrainian and French scientists and educators on the issues of researching and teaching the history of the Holocaust and other genocides of the 20th century. How important is the memory of the genocides of the past for understanding and comprehending the events of modern Russian aggression and the war against Ukraine.

Director of the Institute, Academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Doctor of Historical Sciences Oleg Rafalskiy welcomed the participants of the seminar and emphasized the importance of researching the history of crimes of totalitarian regimes of the last century in order to understand the nature of the modern dictatorial Russian regime, which is waging war against Ukraine.

The moderators of the scientific seminar were Anatoliy Podolskiy, a leading researcher of the Department of Ethnopolitics of our Institute, Candidate of Historical Sciences, and Bruno Boye, the head of the Educational Department of the Shoah Memorial in Paris.

Anatoliy Podolskiy and Bruno Boye

The participants of the two-day event were researchers, teachers of history and social sciences of secondary schools and higher education institutions of Ukraine. The organizers prepared a rich program for 25 participants. During two days, classes, lectures and workshops devoted to the history and memory of genocides on the territory of Ukraine took place at the seminar.

Lecture topics presented during the seminar

• Holocaust Remembrance Today. Historical parallels, relevance of commemoration.
• A multitude of crimes against humanity. Modern qualification.
• Post-Holocaust Suffering and Memory: What’s Wrong with “Never Again”?
• The multitude of reactions of local non-Jews to the Holocaust.
• Methods, approaches, challenges to teaching about the history of the Holocaust and genocide.
• How to use Holocaust photographs in the educational process.
• Museum of military childhood. Relevance of the context for modern Ukraine

Participants of the seminar

Lecturers at the seminar were Ukrainian and French scientists: Toma Shopar, Oleksandr Voronyuk, Pascal Zahari, Lesya Hasydzhak, Virginia Sansiko, Svitlana Osipchuk

Program of the seminar

 Photo gallery of the seminar

On June 14, 2024, another regional online dialogue of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) was held on the topic “Exchange of best practices in professional communication and work with youth in national associations.”

IPSA President Prof. Pablo Oñate spoke at the event. He recalled IPSA’s April 2020 decision to establish a format of virtual meetings to connect with IPSA collective members, share experiences and discuss regional issues at the level of presidents and/or vice presidents (executive directors/general secretaries) of collective members.

Currently, 58 national associations participate in such regional groups. The participation of the Russian Association of Political Science in all IPSA events has been suspended indefinitely due to the Russian military aggression against Ukraine. Regional groups have a maximum of 17 participants, which enables optimal communication and exchange of ideas. Since 2023, regional seminars-dialogues have become a regular subcommittee of IPSA, which is chaired by Emilia Palonen (President of the Political Science Association of Finland) in 2023-2025.

In the course of the regional dialogue, as part of the second group, which includes APNU, the heads of national associations of Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, Georgia, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Serbia, Slovakia, Switzerland, Turkey, Great Britain and the Regional (Northern) Association took part political sciences.

During the event, methods of involving young people in the activities of national associations were discussed; publication activity of national associations; information dissemination practices and activities of associations regarding digitization, making materials available for open access (this is a trend of recent years); publication of information bulletins; activity through social networks and creation of thematic pages in social networks; the role of audiovisual communication in national associations.

During the meeting

On behalf of the Association of Political Sciences of Ukraine, the first vice-president of APNU, Head of the Department of Political Institutes and Processes, Professor Galyna Zelenko took part in the scientific event. She informed her colleagues about APNU news, in particular, about the next APNU congress, which was held in January 2024, about the problems in the association’s activities caused by the full-scale Russian military invasion, about the renewal of membership in the Association, and about the forms of work that the association will introduce after the renewal. This concerns the development of the association’s website, the creation of a database of political science experts, scientific research under the auspices of APNU, joint scientific events with universities and research institutions, publishing activity, and the development of activities in social networks.

The next round of IPSA regional dialogues will take place in January 2025.